Article 10: Right to freedom of expression – According to Article 10, everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right includes the freedom to express opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without official interference and regardless of borders. It protects the right to communicate and express oneself in any medium, including words, images and actions. It is often used to defend press freedom and protect journalists` sources. However, it must be weighed against other considerations. These may include national security, the prevention of crime and unrest, the prevention of the disclosure of confidential information and other rights respected by the ECHR. In 2013, David Miranda, a journalist involved in the Edward Snowden case, was arrested by police at Heathrow Airport for nine hours. He was interrogated without access to a lawyer and was only finally released when the time came to charge or release him. As they had no evidence on which to base an indictment, it was later decided that their detention of Miranda had violated section 10, even though the police had used Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000, an extensive power that allowed detention without suspicion. The Court of Appeal later ruled that the list itself violated Article 10 because it did not contain provisions to protect journalists performing their duties and that Miranda had merely exercised her right as a journalist to publish an article of public interest. (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right includes the freedom to express opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without official interference and regardless of borders. This Article shall not prevent States from requiring licences for radio, television or film companies.
(2) The exercise of these freedoms, since it entails duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or sanctions as are required by law and necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public security, the prevention of order or crime, the protection of health or morals. to protect the reputation or rights of others, to prevent the disclosure of confidential information or to maintain the authority and impartiality of the judiciary. Privacy and communication: criminal and civil law provisions that protect or restrict rights. Article 8: Right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence – According to Article 8, everyone has the right to respect for his or her private and family life, home and correspondence. However, this should be weighed against the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, to prevent disorder or crime, to protect health or morals, or to protect the rights and freedoms of others. One of the rights provided for in article 8 is respect for one`s own sexuality. This was violated by the British armed forces, who asked for details about the plaintiffs` sexuality. Rights also include the unlawful storage and disclosure of personal data or unlawful surveillance by the state and the right not to be physically disabled. The family has a broad interpretation and can live romantic, married, single, with grandparents and siblings. Article 8 is often cited as a defence against deportation or when children can be taken into care.
This was exemplified by a case against Poole Council, which had illegally spied on a family they suspected (wrongly) of living outside the catchment area of the school attended by their children. Poole Council was found to have violated Article 8 by posting staff outside the house to secretly spy on the family and even chasing them on their way to school. Article 11: Right to peaceful assembly and association with others – According to article 11, everyone has the right to peaceful assembly and freedom of association with others, including the right to form and join trade unions to protect his or her interests. This right is closely linked to freedom of expression and allows people to form peaceful protests, participate in marches and meet other like-minded people without state interference. In fact, the State must take appropriate measures to allow any demonstration to take place, even if it does not agree with the reasons for the demonstration. However, violent demonstrations are not protected by Article 11. Any restriction provided for in Article 11 shall be lawful, necessary and proportionate and should be in the interest of national security, the prevention of criminal offences and disorders, the protection of health or morals and the protection of other rights and freedoms. Article 2: Right to life – According to article 2, the right to life of every human being is protected by law. No one may be intentionally deprived of life, except in the execution of a sentence pronounced by a court after his conviction for a crime for which such punishment is provided for by law. In England and Wales, as in many other countries inside and outside Europe, the right to life is protected.
In a very obvious sense, this right is upheld whenever governments abolish the death penalty or when they issue policies to prevent lives from ending without legal excuses. As with all laws, the rights of each individual must be weighed against the rights of others. As far as possible, the right to life should be respected for all parties. In practice, however, this is not always the case. For example, in the case of Re A, a pair of connected twins had to be separated to maintain the life of the strongest twin. Without separation, they would both die, but the separation operation would certainly cause the death of the weaker twin. After a long trial, it was decided that the separation should take place, although this met with fierce resistance, both in some media and especially among certain religious groups. That`s why I want to study human rights in the world. Somehow, I came to the site by chance, graduateway.com/essay-examples/human-rights/ where I read stories about how these rights are respected around the world. But also in the sample essays, many cases have been described of how these rights are flagrantly violated in many countries around the world. Articles 8(2), 10(2) and 11(2): limitations on the rights provided for in Articles 8(1), 10(1) and 11(1).
· The Bill of Rights – 1689, deals with constitutional affairs + establishes fundamental civil rights. The limits of the power of the monarchs + determine the rights of parliament. Note that there are no flashcards for human rights assessments – only knowledge points. Customer reviews, including reviews of product stars, help customers learn more about the product and decide if it`s the right product for them. appeals to the European Court of Human Rights; the role of national courts; the impact of decisions on States and beneficiaries. Article 5: Right to liberty and security of person – According to Article 5, everyone has the right to liberty and security of the person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty except in certain cases. These include the lawful detention of a person after conviction by a competent court, the arrest or lawful detention of a person where it is reasonably considered necessary to prevent a person from committing or fleeing a criminal offence, to prevent the spread of infectious diseases, persons with an unhealthy mind, alcoholics or drug addicts or vagrants, and to prevent unauthorized entry into the country or person against whom measures are taken with a view to expulsion or extradition. In 2001, after the terrorist attacks in New York, the Anti-Terrorism Crime and Security Act of 2001 was passed.
Part 4 of the Act provided that any alien suspected of being a terrorist (but not convicted or even charged) could be detained indefinitely without charge or trial if he or she could not be deported. However, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (then the House of Lords) ruled that the detention of aliens without charge indefinitely violated Article 5 and was discriminatory, so that it applied only to foreigners and not to domestic terrorists. The bill was repealed in response to the House of Lords` declaration of incompatibility. The United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948. · 5 (2) in a language in which they understand the reasons for the arrest, Christie v. Leachinsky arrests accused of false detention for illegal possession. Until the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998, freedom of expression was a residual freedom that existed in the sense that there were relatively few laws restricting it. In one particular case – and apparently only in one case – the right to freedom of expression was guaranteed by law. that freedom of expression, freedom of expression and debates or procedures in Parliament should not be denounced or questioned in a court or place outside Parliament.
· 5 (5) Right to compensation in the event of unlawful detention. · Restrictions, legal detention of people after conviction, violation of court decisions, education, illegal immigration. Article 5.1: Right to liberty and security of the person.